Animals Rights sabotage farmers Twitter campaign!

Andrew Campbell – a dairy farmer from Middlesex, Ontario never imagined the firestorm he’d unleashed on Twitter by posting the day-to-day runnings of his farm near London.

Campbell’s posts evidently caught the attention of Vegans and Animals Groups from all around, as hoards of these misguided individuals came-out of the woodwork in an attempt to sabotage his Twitter campaign!

Angered with the young farmer’s decision to share positive results from his agricultural operation online, those opposed to the livestock industry swamped Campbell’s Twitter postings that used the hashtag “#Farm365.”

Along with Twitter rants bemoaning the use of animals for food, graphic images of animal’s being slaughtered started flooding Campbell’s 13,000 Twitter followers!

In angry and disrespectful tweets, Campbell was referred to as both a ‘murderer’ and ‘rapist’ of animals (loose reference, I assume, to artificial insemination practises used in livestock industry)

The bitter tweeting battle quickly spilled over into #Ontag – a hashtag used mostly by people in Ontario’s agriculture industry to share information.

“What we have seen is there are activists concerned about animal care and thousands of farmers who are concerned about animal care”, said Campbell  “There is just maybe a little bit of a gap there,”  he added.

The young farmer went on to explain that, “If anything, this shows the reality that there is a gap in the information on how animals are raised on farms”

If nothing else, Andrew Campbell’s Twitter campaign may serve to educate those individuals otherwise clueless on the inner-workings of the livestock industry.

One thing for certain, Campbell’s story has already succeeding in demonstrating the ignorance shared by many Vegan and Animal Rights Groups!

Outdoorsguy

 

DFO planning massive grey seal cull

 

Grey

According to the Fur Institute of Canada, the Department of Fisheries and Ocean’s planned cull of up to 220,000 grey seals off Nova Scotia’s sable island, is a prime example of an ecological “mess” created by the animal-rights movement against the sustainable-use of seal products.

The plan – which could cost Canadian taxpayers up to $35 million -involves either a large-scale kill and disposal of grey seals, or a targeted contraception program aimed at Canada’s grey seal population, which has grown to 300,000 strong and is now considered a danger to the recovery of threatened groundfish stocks.

According to the Fur Institute, all industry efforts to utilize the animals in accordance with government-set quotas have failed in recent years, due in large part to the strong animal-rights lobby against the use of the animals.

“We have said for years that there are only two options for managing abundant populations, as a sustainable resource, or as a pest,” said Rob Cahill, the Fur Institute’s Executive director.   

Members of the Fur Institute involved in the seal processing sector have indicated that it has not been possible to develop a viable plan for the commercial use of grey seals in recent years, due to anti-sealing pressures.

“We hope that this announced cull will be a wake-up call for Canadians who have questions about the commercial use of harps seals, the population of which dwarfs the current grey seal numbers by 23 to 1,” says Cahill.

Quick Facts on Sealing in Canada

–          An April 2010 poll conducted by TNS Canadian Facts indicated that 2 out of 3 Canadians accept seal hunting where populations are not endangered and animal welfare is respected.

–          The same poll indicated that fully 85% of Canadians appreciate the need to manage seal populations in relation to the abundance of important fish stocks.

 

–          Canada’s harp seal population consumes approximately 8 million metric tonnes of fish annually.  By contrast, Canada’s entire fishery yields less than 1 million metric tonnes annually.

 

The Seals and Sealing Network Study was conducted using TNS Canadian Facts’ national bi-weekly telephone omnibus service.  A total of 1,017 nationally representative Canadian adults were interviewed between April 12 and 18, 2010.  For a survey sample this size, the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.